Re: [PATCH 00/11] drm/msm: A5XX preemption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 6 February 2017 at 17:59, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:39:28AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> This initial series implements 4 ringbuffers to give sufficient coverage for the
>> range of priority levels requested by the GLES and compute extensions. The
>> targeted ringbuffer is specified in the command submission flags. The default
>> ring is 0 (lowest priority).
>
> Link to userspace part that implements these extensions? Also which
> gles/compute extensions are you talking about? Asking not just because of
> the open source userspace requirement, but also because we want to
> upstream a scheduler on the i915 side. Getting alignment on that across
> drm drivers would be sweet.

Assuming he meant EGL rather than GLES, this is the usual one:
https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensions/IMG/EGL_IMG_context_priority.txt

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux