On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:51:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:15:10AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > [...] > > As is, I'm stuck out here with my panel driver I submitted on December > > 14th completely ignored, and no other developer will look at it because > > their review doesn't count and only yours does. > > For the record, until earlier today when Daniel started to review your > patches, no doubt in response to this discussion, there was exactly one > response to one of your clock driver patches in the series. > > So can we please stop singling out panel drivers? This is a general > problem that we've had across the kernel, or at least the ARM and > related parts of it, for as long as I can remember. I only looked at that as part of the drm-misc small drivers experiment, to help kickstart a review market. I didn't look at the panel stuff. And the reason I looked at that right now is because right now we started this experiment. That has nothing at all to do with what's going on with drm-panel. If you look at drm-misc, the dsi patches for vc4 have now landed, but the panel driver for the rpi 7" touchscreen hasn't. And Eric had the dsi patches queued in his vc4 tree since a while, just waiting to be sent out in a pull request. We've only gone through the fast review+merging to drm-misc to try out the new process. So not related at all I think. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
