Re: [PATCH] gem: RFC: add support for private objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These small changes should allow GEM to be used with non shmem objects as
> well as shmem objects. In the GMA500 case it allows the base framebuffer to
> appear as a GEM object and thus acquire a handle and work with KMS.
>
> For i915 it ought to be trivial to get back the wasted memory but putting the
> system fb back into stolen RAM and in general I can imagine it allowing the
> use of GEM and thus KMS with all the older cards that have their framebuffer
> firmly placed in video RAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux