On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:29:01AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 07:38:53AM +1100, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > You don't appear to have sent this to any of the DRM maintainers - it > > > does need review from them. > > > It was sent to dri-devel. That's us. And the patch already has a r-b > > From DRM on it. > > I see. For most subsystems you need to actually copy a human to make > sure that things are seen - just the list isn't enough. In terms of it > being reviewed one of the problems with DRM not listing the reviwers in > the MAINTAINERS file or anything is that it's very hard for anyone to > tell if something is considered a good enough review or if it's just a > review from someone who happens to contribute to DRM sometimes. Jani is now officially listed as drm-misc maintainer in MAINTAINERS. We also have official entries for other major areas (like bridge drivers or similar). Where do you see a gap? Note that before KS this was indeed not there, because of the committer model hanging in the air a bit ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
