On 01/19/2017 11:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 07:38:53AM +1100, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> You don't appear to have sent this to any of the DRM >>> maintainers - it does need review from them. > >> It was sent to dri-devel. That's us. And the patch already has >> a r-b From DRM on it. > > I see. For most subsystems you need to actually copy a human to > make sure that things are seen - just the list isn't enough. In > terms of it being reviewed one of the problems with DRM not listing > the reviwers in the MAINTAINERS file or anything is that it's very > hard for anyone to tell if something is considered a good enough > review or if it's just a review from someone who happens to > contribute to DRM sometimes. > I limited diffusion to ASoC, as Daniel Vetter and Takashi Iwai discussed the topic here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg58114.html Seems that is was not a good strategy as it leads to discussions.. Sorry for this. Regards Arnaud _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
