On 2017年01月17日 18:38, Chris Zhong wrote:
@@ -821,8 +824,6 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_encoder_mode_set(struct
drm_encoder *encoder,
struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder);
int ret;
- dsi->mode = adjusted_mode;
-
I prefer to keep the original method, although this"dsi->mode" pointer
is same as "&dsi->connector.state->crtc->state->adjusted_mode; "
I still think dsi->mode makes the process easier to read
"&dsi->connector.state->crtc->state->adjusted_mode;" is too long, and
dsi->connector.state->crtc can be NULL, seems not good.
agree with Chris, I think dsi->mode is better.
Bug the origin code "dsi->mode = adjusted_mode; " also has a bug,
adjusted_mode's lift time is unknown, use a pointer from adjusted_mode
is dangerous.
I think we can use like that, copy a display mode to dsi->mode:
struct dw_mipi_dsi
{
- struct drm_display_mode *mode;
+ struct drm_display_mode mode;
}
xxx_encoder_mode_set()
{
drm_mode_copy(&dsi->mode, adjusted_mode);
}
--
Mark Yao
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel