On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:33:38PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I reported the include issue for tracepoints a while ago, but nothing > seems to have happened. Now it bit us, since the drm_mm_print > conversion was broken for armada. Fix them both. Nothing's happened because I haven't had an opportunity to investigate yet. It's not as simple as you think... This has been tested over several kernel versions before submission, and it's also been sitting in my build tree for a while before sending upstream. At no point have I seen the failure you are reporting. The tracepoints have been in use on 4.7 and 4.8 kernels, and it builds fine there without any changes. It's been in my nightly builder, which has found no problems with it, eg, 4.9 allmodconfig: CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_crtc.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_fb.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_fbdev.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_overlay.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_trace.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_510.o CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_debugfs.o LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada.o So the question remains: why do you see it, and I don't - there's something different in our build environments that's triggering it. I always build with a separated object tree - maybe you build in the same tree. Does the problem disappear if you build using a separated object tree (O=/path/to/object/tree) ? However, given the contents of your patch, it seems only relevant for separated object tree builds. So... confused. I'll investigate further once I've updated my cubox tree to 4.9. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
