RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Wrap the check for atomic_commit implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Done, hope I got it right this time. 

-DK

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:52 AM
To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>; nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Wrap the check for atomic_commit implementation

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 12:12 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > This check is useful for drivers that do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set 
> > but have atomic modesetting internally implemented. Wrap the check 
> > into a function since this is used in many places and as a bonus, 
> > the function name helps to document what the check is for.
> > 
> > v2:
> > Change return type to bool (Ville)
> > Move the function drm_atomic.h (Daniel)
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c             |  6 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c |  5 +++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c   |  6 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c     |  3 ++-
> >  include/drm/drm_atomic.h                    | 11 +++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h 
> > index 8cc7ca2..43db162 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h
> > @@ -419,5 +419,16 @@ drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(const struct 
> > drm_crtc_state
> > *state)
> >  	       state->connectors_changed;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - check if the driver implements
> 
> Shouldn't this be
> 
> /**
>  * drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - ...
> 
> so it is included in the generated documentation?

Yup. I'm blind this week it seems. DK, please run

$ make DOCBOOKS="" htmldocs

and make sure your new documentation does get rendered correctly and shows up in the output.
-Daniel

> 
> Ander
> 
> 
> > + * atomic_commit()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + *
> > + * This check is useful if drivers do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set 
> > +but
> > + * have atomic modesetting internally implemented.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(struct drm_device 
> > +*dev) {
> > +	return dev->mode_config.funcs->atomic_commit ? true : false; }
> >  
> >  #endif /* DRM_ATOMIC_H_ */

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux