Hi all, On 2 January 2017 at 13:03, ayaka <ayaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/02/2017 07:07 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:53:16PM +0800, ayaka wrote: >>> On 01/02/2017 05:10 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>>> If the format resembles the existing formats but on a different bit >>>> depth, >>>> it should be named in similar fashion. >>> >>> Do you mean it would be better if it is called as NV12_10? >> >> If it otherwise resembles NV12 but just has 10 bits per pixel, I think >> NV12_10 is a good name for it. > > The main reason I don't like it is that there is a various of software > having used the P010 for this kind of pixel format. It would leadi a > conflict between them(and I never saw it is used as NV12_10), as the P010 is > more common to be used. Indeed; GStreamer, FFmpeg and Microsoft all call this P010: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb970578(v=vs.85).aspx fourcc.org is supposed to reflect Microsoft's registry, but seems to not be actively maintained anymore. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
