On 23.12.2016 11:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:46:33PM +0100, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index a5960e5..b2eaaab 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -186,11 +186,6 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_fini(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
#endif
}
-extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
-extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
-
/**
* ww_mutex_lock - acquire the w/w mutex
* @lock: the mutex to be acquired
@@ -220,10 +215,8 @@ extern int __must_check __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-static inline int ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
-{
- return __ww_mutex_lock(lock, ctx);
-}
+extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_interruptible - acquire the w/w mutex, interruptible
@@ -255,11 +248,8 @@ static inline int ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ct
*
* A mutex acquired with this function must be released with ww_mutex_unlock.
*/
-static inline int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
-{
- return __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(lock, ctx);
-}
+extern int __must_check ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx);
/**
* ww_mutex_lock_slow - slowpath acquiring of the w/w mutex
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index a41bec2..282c6de 100644
For some reason this patch appears to make lib/locking-selftest.c really
unhappy.
I get endless streams of:
../lib/locking-selftest.c: In function ‘ww_test_fail_acquire’:
../lib/locking-selftest.c:1141:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
ret = WWL(&o, &t);
^
Apparently GCC gets confused about __much_check on inline functions or
something, or I got the patch wrong.
Weird, I'm not getting that, and it makes no sense either from a quick
glimpse of the code. Is there anything beside
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS I would have to enable to trigger
this? FWIW:
$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel