https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38800 --- Comment #29 from Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-07 01:47:49 PDT --- Thanks for explaining the problems with doing everything directly in the ioctl, Mario. Guess it was too good to be true... I agree it should be a good idea to defer to an interrupt triggered by completion of rendering to the new front buffer. But I don't think a newly created fence is suitable for that, as more, unrelated rendering might have been queued since the last rendering to the new front buffer. The existing fence bo->tbo.sync_obj should be used. However, there might be no bo->tbo.sync_obj if rendering has already completed. Also, I'm afraid we do need to wait for out of vblank first, otherwise the flip might happen one frame earlier than expected by userspace, if it manages to call the flip ioctl during the previous vblank. In summary, how about something like this for the flip ioctl: 1. If we're in vblank, defer step 2 until after vblank. Maybe via a vsync or vline interrupt, or if that's not reliable, maybe it's acceptable for the ioctl to block for up to ~1ms. 2. If the new front buffer has a bo->tbo.sync_obj fence, defer step 3 until it has signalled. 3. Emit flip. If the hardware doesn't take it immediately, defer step 4 until the next vertical blank. 4. Signal flip completion to userspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel