Re: [RESEND][PATCH] libkms/exynos: fix memory leak in error path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 2016-12-14 12:21:55 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 14 December 2016 at 12:07, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2016-12-14 17:16:30 +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> >> This patch fixes memory leak in error path of exynos_bo_create().
> >
> > Indeed, thanks!
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  libkms/exynos.c |    3 ++-
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libkms/exynos.c b/libkms/exynos.c
> >> index 5de2e5a..0e97fb5 100644
> >> --- a/libkms/exynos.c
> >> +++ b/libkms/exynos.c
> >> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> >>               pitch = (pitch + 512 - 1) & ~(512 - 1);
> >>               size = pitch * ((height + 4 - 1) & ~(4 - 1));
> >>       } else {
> >> -             return -EINVAL;
> >> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> >> +             goto err_free;
> >>       }
> >>
> >>       memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.1
> >>
> >
> > However, I feel like a cleaner fix might be to simply move the
> > allocation to where it's used and remove the now-unnecessary
> > error path, ie.:
> >
> > ----8<----
> > diff --git a/libkms/exynos.c b/libkms/exynos.c
> > index 5de2e5a..e2c1c9f 100644
> > --- a/libkms/exynos.c
> > +++ b/libkms/exynos.c
> > @@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> >                 }
> >         }
> >
> > -       bo = calloc(1, sizeof(*bo));
> > -       if (!bo)
> > -               return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> >         if (type == KMS_BO_TYPE_CURSOR_64X64_A8R8G8B8) {
> >                 pitch = 64 * 4;
> >                 size = 64 * 64 * 4;
> > @@ -96,7 +92,11 @@ exynos_bo_create(struct kms_driver *kms,
> >
> >         ret = drmCommandWriteRead(kms->fd, DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_CREATE, &arg, sizeof(arg));
> >         if (ret)
> > -               goto err_free;
> > +               return ret;
> > +
> > +       bo = calloc(1, sizeof(*bo));
> > +       if (!bo)
> Here we're missing the drmIoctl(... DRM_IOCTL_GEM_CLOSE ...)

You're right... I'm not actually improving anything with my suggestion.

> 
> Another solution is to move size/pitch calculation before the calloc.
> Not sure which one will be better though.

Let's just land Seung-Woo's fix?
We can always refactor later :)
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux