On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:59:10AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Instead of detaching only the bridge directly connected to the encoder,
> detach all bridges in the chain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
> index 0944f08abf58..5dde3c6b1467 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
> @@ -159,8 +159,16 @@ void drm_encoder_cleanup(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> * the indices on the drm_encoder after us in the encoder_list.
> */
>
> - if (encoder->bridge)
> - drm_bridge_detach(encoder->bridge);
> + if (encoder->bridge) {
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge = encoder->bridge;
> + struct drm_bridge *next;
> +
> + while (bridge) {
> + next = bridge->next;
> + drm_bridge_detach(bridge);
> + bridge = next;
> + }
> + }
I wonder whether we should detach inside-out here. But I guess that can be
fixed once someone stumbles over this ;-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Please push to drm-misc yourself, you haz commit rights and all that ;-)
-Daniel
>
> drm_mode_object_unregister(dev, &encoder->base);
> kfree(encoder->name);
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
