On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:57:45PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We can be more clever than that and merge the 2 list walking loops. > > It's all under the one mutex critical section anyway, so nothing funny > > can happen. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 28 +++++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > index 64c2971478db..a6205a92dfee 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ int drm_mode_getresources(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > struct drm_file *file_priv) > > { > > struct drm_mode_card_res *card_res = data; > > - struct list_head *lh; > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb; > > struct drm_connector *connector; > > struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > @@ -105,25 +104,20 @@ int drm_mode_getresources(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > > > > > mutex_lock(&file_priv->fbs_lock); > > - /* > > - * For the non-control nodes we need to limit the list of resources > > - * by IDs in the group list for this node > > - */ > > - list_for_each(lh, &file_priv->fbs) > > - fb_count++; > > - > > /* handle this in 4 parts */ > > /* FBs */ > > - if (card_res->count_fbs >= fb_count) { > > - copied = 0; > > - fb_id = (uint32_t __user *)(unsigned long)card_res->fb_id_ptr; > > - list_for_each_entry(fb, &file_priv->fbs, filp_head) { > > - if (put_user(fb->base.id, fb_id + copied)) { > > - mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock); > > - return -EFAULT; > > - } > > - copied++; > > + copied = 0; > > + fb_id = (uint32_t __user *)(unsigned long)card_res->fb_id_ptr; > > + list_for_each_entry(fb, &file_priv->fbs, filp_head) { > > + fb_count++; > > + if (fb_count > card_res->count_fbs) > > + continue; > > + > > + if (put_user(fb->base.id, fb_id + copied)) { > > + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock); > > + return -EFAULT; > > } > > + copied++; > > if (fb_count < card_res->count_fbs && > put_user(fb->base.id fb_id + fb_count) { > } > fb_count++; // no need for copied > > I'd just like for one style :) Otoh, this seems reasonable to apply to > crtc/encoders/connectors as well, and on the other we already have a > counter for the others. Hmm, setting count = copied in the previous > patch is thereby wrong (change in uABI). It's only a change if the connector count changed between when we read it and when we walked the list. But I guess you've convinced me that simplifying this loops more is a good idea, and this way we can use the same style for all of them. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel