On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:55:53 +0200 Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0200 > > Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Commit 6067aa (drm/i915: split clock gating init into per-chipset > > > functions) introduces an init_clock_gating-pointer. There is one case, > > > however, where it does not get set, so that caused an OOPS. Change the > > > code to return -ENODEV in this case and propagate it to the upper > > > layers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > Looks good, thanks Wolfram. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Just wondering: I don't see it in linux-next or the i915-branches I am aware > of. Forgotten or intentional? Bounce it over to Keith with the reviewed-by and he'll pick it up. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
