There has been no comments to these patches, so I guess there are no major objections. I can go forward with this, and I think a similar job should be done for drm_panel too. But I wonder if this should be done for 4.10 any more? Best regards, Jyri On 12/01/16 17:52, Jyri Sarha wrote: > Note! This series is not yet ready and should not be used as is, it is > just an RFC. > > The function documentation is missing and so are the modifications to > all affected drivers. I have added the modification patches for tilcdc > and ti-tfp410 to serve as an example and I have put them into separate > patches for readability. > > For the matter of adding devres version of of_drm_get_bridge() and > drm_bridge_alloc(), I think that is a good idea. With reference > counting, each user can hold on to their reference to the bridge > object as long as they need it. The bridge object exists as long as > any of the users still holds on to it. > > Cheers, > Jyri > > Jyri Sarha (3): > drm/drm_bridge: adjust bridge module's refcount > drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: Adapt to bridge object and module refcounting > drm/tilcdc: Adapt to bridge object refcounting > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 16 ++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_external.c | 15 ++++-- > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 10 +++- > 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
