On 12/07/16 16:46, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > This implementation is a hack in the first place. The code will be >> > removed when DRM has a proper generic connector support. > Hm, what's this generic drm connector thing you talk about? What's it for? > Asking since I haven't seen that yet nor heard in a discussion ... After looking up this comment from Laurent: On 11/10/16 14:15, Laurent Pinchart wrote [1]: >> > The implementation side is not so critical, because it more easily >> > changed, but should I create an independent generic platform-device >> > driver for such DVI/HDMI connector or just implement the connector side >> > within tfp410 driver? > Longer term I'd like to go for connector drivers, but it might take a bit of > infrastructure work. If you can give it a try it would be great ! Otherwise > I'm fine with handling that in the tfp410 driver for now. > ... I think I miss understood it. He was probably referring to the infrastructure needed in the tfp410 driver. I'll try to get that done for 4.11 or 4.12. Best regards, Jyri [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-November/123337.html _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
