Re: [PATCH 14/22] dt-bindings: display: dw-hdmi: Clean up DT bindings documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rob,

On Tuesday 06 Dec 2016 15:15:50 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:43:29AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Make it clear that the core bridge/dw_hdmi.txt document isn't a device
> > tree binding by itself but is meant to be referenced by platform device
> > tree bindings, and update the Rockchip and Freescale DWC HDMI TX
> > bindings to reference it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/dw_hdmi.txt | 85 +++++++----------
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/imx/hdmi.txt       | 51 +++++++------
> >  .../bindings/display/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.txt | 43 +++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Really, the ddc-i2c-bus prop needs to move to a connector node, but
> that's a separate problem.

I fully agree. One step at a time though :-)

> We might also want to drop the 'ddc-' part and have a generic way to refer
> to an i2c bus. There's a couple of other cases.

Right, but a DT node might need to refer to multiple I2C buses (probably not 
for connectors though). The ddc- prefix serves a similar purpose than the 
power supply or GPIO name in the *-supply or *-gpios properties.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux