Re: [PATCH] drm/irq: drm_legacy_ prefix for legacy ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Spotted while auditing our ioctl table. Also nuke the
> not-really-kerneldoc comments, we don't document internals and
> definitely don't want to mislead people with the old dragons.

Not just specific to this patch, but I'm not sure I agree with the "we
don't document internals" in general. That seems to be something that
just started happening without much discussion. We have *loads* of
complicated functions that would benefit from documentation, even if
they're internal (i.e. not exported).

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux