Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix: Don't return -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in PSR functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 12/02/2016 08:02 AM, zain wang wrote:
We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we should
return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr() without any error code.
Let's retrun 0 instead of -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in
analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr().

Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index 6e0447f..0cb3695 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
 	struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;

 	if (!dp->psr_support)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return 0;

Looking at the rockchip analogix dp code, in analogix_dp_psr_set, the worker that calls
analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr isn't even if psr isn't enabled. So, the bridge funcs
shouldn't be called in the first place. I think the error handling is fine to have
here.


 	/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.9 */
 	memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
 	struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;

 	if (!dp->psr_support)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return 0;

 	/* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.9 */
 	memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
@@ -878,6 +878,8 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
 	dp->psr_support = analogix_dp_detect_sink_psr(dp);
 	if (dp->psr_support)
 		analogix_dp_enable_sink_psr(dp);
+	else
+		dev_warn(dp->dev, "Sink not support PSR\n");

This doesn't seem beneficial either. There seems to be a debug
print already in analogix_dp_detect_sink_psr which reports PSR
related info.

Archit

 }

 /*


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux