Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5 v2] drm/bridge: adv7511: Reuse __adv7511_power_on/off() when probing EDID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/29/2016 10:34 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I've found that by just turning the chip on and off via the
POWER_DOWN register, I end up getting i2c_transfer errors
on HiKey.

Investigating further, it seems some of the register state
in the regmap cache is somehow getting lost. Using the logic
in __adv7511_power_on/off() which syncs and dirtys the cache
avoids this issue.

Thus this patch changes the EDID probing logic so that we
re-use the __adv7511_power_on/off() calls.

Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Split into two patches to make the change more clear.
    Also provided more rational as to why the change is
    important.

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 17 +++--------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
index 1948968..487b33d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
@@ -559,24 +559,13 @@ static int adv7511_get_modes(struct adv7511 *adv7511,
 	unsigned int count;

 	/* Reading the EDID only works if the device is powered */
-	if (!adv7511->powered) {
-		regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
-				   ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN, 0);
-		if (adv7511->i2c_main->irq) {
-			regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(0),
-				     ADV7511_INT0_EDID_READY);
-			regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(1),
-				     ADV7511_INT1_DDC_ERROR);
-		}
-		adv7511->current_edid_segment = -1;
-	}
+	if (!adv7511->powered)
+		__adv7511_power_on(adv7511);

In terms of changes in terms of register configurations, replacing with
__adv7511_power_on() here would add a register write to ADV7511_REG_POWER2
as discussed before.

Also, after the patch that enables HPD, we'd also be adding the ADV7511_INT0_HPD
bit in ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(0).

I am not entirely sure about what effect adding POWER2 would have. If we don't
see any negative effects because of it, I think we should be fine.

The extra HPD bit in INT_ENABLE(0) shouldn't be a problem, though. In fact, it
prevents the HPD mask from being cleared after we get_modes is called, which may
have resulted in us missing out on HPD interrupts.

Thanks,
Archit


 	edid = drm_do_get_edid(connector, adv7511_get_edid_block, adv7511);

 	if (!adv7511->powered)
-		regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
-				   ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN,
-				   ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN);
+		__adv7511_power_off(adv7511);

 	kfree(adv7511->edid);
 	adv7511->edid = edid;


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux