On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:42:26PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > + ww_mutex_lock(&resv->lock.base, NULL); > Yuck, can we rename base to __NEVER_TOUCH_DIRECTLY_OUTSIDE_LOCKING_CORE? > It's harder to get them confused like that, even with a null context it's illegal to call mutex_lock/unlock directly. I think there's a __private sparse annotation that could be used. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
