Re: Question regarding clocks in the DW-HDMI DT bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi:


On 2016年11月25日 07:26, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hello Fabio and Vladimir,

Thank you for your quick responses.

On Friday 25 Nov 2016 00:16:00 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 11/25/2016 12:07 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Andy,

As the author of the DW-HDMI DT bindings this question is addressed to
you, but information from anyone is more than welcome.

The DT bindings specify two clocks named "iahb" and "isfr" but don't
describe them. While I assume that the "isfr" clock corresponds to the
"isfrclk" input signal of the DW HDMI, there is no "iahb" clock
described in the IP core datasheet.
i.MX6Q has a DW-HDMI IP block.

The names in the devicetree binding matches the ones listed at the
i.MX6Q Reference Manual - Table 33-1. HDMI Clocks
correct, for your convenience the table is copied below:

Clock name |     Clock Root     | Description
-----------+--------------------+---------------------------------------
    iahbclk  | ahb_clk_root       | Bus clock
    icecclk  | ckil_sync_clk_root | CEC low-frequency clock (32kHZ)
    ihclk    | ahb_clk_root       | Module clock
    isfrclk  | video_27m_clk_root | Internal SFR clock (video clock 27MHz)

Here AHB stands for ARM Advanced High-performance Bus.
That's what I suspected. I believe the "iahb" name is wrong, as the DW HDMI TX
IP core clearly documents the bus clock as being called "iapbclk". We could
rename that in the DT bindings (with compatibility code in the driver to keep
supporting the old name) but it might not be worth it. The bindings should
however document that the "iahb" clock is the IP core's "iapbclk" bus clock.


I got the clock name from I.MX6Q TRM, I also checked the name again with Rockchip IC design team now, hope to get some new information soon.

Another question I have about the bus clock (CC'ing the devicetree mailing
list as well as the clock maintainers) is whether it should be made optional.
The clock is obviously mandatory from a hardware point of view (given that APB
is a synchronous bus and thus requires a clock), but in some SoCs
(specifically for the Renesas SoCs) that clock is always on and can't be
controlled. We already omit bus clocks in DT for most IP cores when the clock
can never be controlled (and we also omit a bunch of other clocks that we
don't even know exist), so it could make sense to make the clock optional.
Otherwise there would be runtime overhead trying to handle a clock that can't
be controlled.

If this is the case on Renesas SOCs, we can consider make the clock as optional. Or move all the clock operations to platform specific code(dw_hdmi-rockchip.c/dw_hdmi-imx.c)?

By the way while we're discussing DW HDMI bindings specific to iMX,
I would recommend to remove utterly hackish and iMX only "gpr"
property from the example in bindings/display/bridge/dw_hdmi.txt


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux