Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma-buf/fence: make timeout handling in fence_default_wait consistent (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex, Christian,

On 8 November 2016 at 02:46, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kernel functions taking a timeout usually return 1 on success even
> when they get a zero timeout.
>
> v2: agd: rebase on drm-next
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> Signen-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> These are the same patches Christian sent out previously, just
> rebased on the fence naming changes in drm-next.
>
Series applied to drm-misc; Thanks!

Best,
Sumit.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux