On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, > and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA > operations to make room. > > A consensus was reached in > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html > that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. > Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases (and we wanted > to wait until after the sw_sync destage), so hopefully it remains a good > thing! > > I've pushed the patch to > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=dma-fence&id=a4a27d87e4fccefb9f9d55f9c73ccab8f2ade3cc > > as I suspect it might be too large for the list. > > Highlights of the change: > > struct fence -> struct dma_fence (and all fence*() to dma_fence*()) > struct fence_array -> struct dma_fence_array > > 107 files changed, 1174 insertions(+), 1136 deletions(-) > > Mostly generated with the provided cocci spatch, but even with > --include-headers it seemed to miss some headers, and I never quite > worked out the substition commands for macros, so there is some grep and > replace. For the curious (like me), here's the diff between ickle's HEAD and what the cocci script outputs: http://hastebin.com/udizixoyed.go Sean > -Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
