Hi, Dave,
It is the explanation that is inaccurate; I was still thinking about mmap when
the new paradigm is to do the mapping when the VM faults.
I believe the code that requires this patch is: ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c: ttm_bo_vm_fault(),
specifically:
for (i = 0; i < TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT; ++i) {
if (bo->mem.bus.is_iomem)
pfn = ((bo->mem.bus.base + bo->mem.bus.offset) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + page_offset;
else {
The "pfn" needs to reflect the correct system bus address to get to the VRAM
on the graphics card.
I will rework the commentary and resend.
Thanks for the feedback.
Jay
On 06/13/2011 07:35 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Jay Estabrook <jay.estabrook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Alpha needs to have the system bus address for the device's local
>> memory available, so that it can be returned to user-level, where
>> it may be used in an mmap(). So, we make bus.addr hold the ioremap()
>> return for kernel use, and then we can modify bus.base appropriately.
>>
>
> I don't get this. why is mmap passing in an address? we don't do that anymore.
>
> When you mmap the device node it passes back a hashed offset in the
> table, that the
> kernel then translates into a proper address and sets up the page tables.
>
> So I really don't get what this patch is doing, either the
> explaination of what it is doing is wrong
> or it is wrong.
>
> Dave.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
