[Adding Matt] On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good > start. 0) Why use a personal notebook when one can just post any half baked idea to lkml? 1) I stumbled on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361357 ;(s ame hardware, rather similar trace). 2) That report was about the first Fedora (rawhide) kernel release after this commit http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/kernel.git/co mmit/?h=f25&id=7d2c2f2d91793b5da452bee9bea4fa32051c8608 ("Bring in patch-series from drm-next to fix skl_update_other_pipe_wm issues"). 3) That seventeen part series ended up in v4.8. The last commit of that series is commit 5b483747a925 ("drm/i915: Remove wm_config from dev_priv/intel_atomic_state"). 4) So, with a little bit of luck, my bisect might only need to look at those seventeen commits. Still, it will probably be next week before I have a day or two to actually perform that bisect. To be continued, Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
