Re: [PATCH] *-symbol-check: Don't hard-code nm executable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Heiko,

On 3 October 2016 at 18:26, Heiko Becker <heirecka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Helpful if your nm executable has a prefix based on the
> architecture, for example.
>
Thanks for the patch.

Currently one can run the tests as standalone. Personally I don't mind
if we "loose" that functionality or not, but in either case we want
some sane default is NM is not set.

The decision whether to error/skip out or use a default value, I'll
leave to you ;-)

Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux