On 10/03/16 18:43, Emil Velikov wrote: > Earlier commit was removing all the users of drm_platform_set_busid and > removed the virtio hunk (which uses the PCI version of the function) by > mistake. > > This in itself resulted in user space receiving an incorrect value for > the busid, which in the case below lead to the failure to detect > the (correct) device and ultimately the X server failing to start. > > Fixes: a325725633c ("drm: Lobotomize set_busid nonsense for !pci > drivers") > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366842 > Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Since I'm not 100% sure if we can get into .set_busid() as pci_dev is > NULL (for the virtio-vga 'vs' virgio-gpu-pci case) I've left the local > wrapper. > > Note: patch is against mainline (refs/tags/v4.8) but should apply for > drm-next/others. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c | 10 ++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c > index 7f0e93f87..88a3916 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c > @@ -27,6 +27,16 @@ > > #include "virtgpu_drv.h" > > +int drm_virtio_set_busid(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_master *master) > +{ > + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev->pdev; > + > + if (pdev) { > + return drm_pci_set_busid(dev, master); > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > static void virtio_pci_kick_out_firmware_fb(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) > { > struct apertures_struct *ap; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > index c13f70c..5820b702 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static const struct file_operations virtio_gpu_driver_fops = { > > static struct drm_driver driver = { > .driver_features = DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_PRIME | DRIVER_RENDER | DRIVER_ATOMIC, > + .set_busid = drm_virtio_set_busid, > .load = virtio_gpu_driver_load, > .unload = virtio_gpu_driver_unload, > .open = virtio_gpu_driver_open, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > index b18ef31..acf556a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ > #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 1 > > /* virtgpu_drm_bus.c */ > +int drm_virtio_set_busid(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_master *master); > int drm_virtio_init(struct drm_driver *driver, struct virtio_device *vdev); > > struct virtio_gpu_object { > I've come up with the identical patch (code-wise). I haven't posted it yet because: - I'd like to reproduce the original issue with the fresh 4.8 kernel, using the F24 config (so the build is taking forever :( :( :(), - I'd like to test the patch too. Obviously, testing your patch is just as good as testing my (identical) patch, it's just that I'll have to respond with a Tested-by. However, my commit message is different; what do you think of it? -------- commit a005c99587ce52b60cfae897071f124cc5867347 Author: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Oct 3 17:59:14 2016 +0200 drm: virtio: reinstate drm_virtio_set_busid() Before commit a325725633c2 ("drm: Lobotomize set_busid nonsense for !pci drivers"), several DRM drivers for platform devices used to expose an explicit "drm_driver.set_busid" callback, invariably backed by drm_platform_set_busid(). Commit a325725633c2 removed drm_platform_set_busid(), along with the referring .set_busid field initializations. This was justified because interchangeable functionality had been implemented in drm_dev_alloc() / drm_dev_init(), which DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION would rely on going forward. However, commit a325725633c2 also removed drm_virtio_set_busid(), for which the same consolidation was not appropriate: this .set_busid callback had been implemented with drm_pci_set_busid(), and not drm_platform_set_busid(). The error regressed Xorg/xserver on QEMU's "virtio-vga" card; the drmGetBusid() function from libdrm would no longer return stable PCI identifiers like "pci:0000:00:02.0", but rather unstable platform ones like "virtio0". Reinstate drm_virtio_set_busid() with judicious use of git checkout -p a325725633c2^ -- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reported-by: Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: a325725633c26aa66ab940f762a6b0778edf76c0 Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366842 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c | 10 ++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+) -------- I obviously don't "insist" that you take my commit message :), but you might want to scavenge it for some bits. You might not as well. :) Regarding the local wrapper around drm_pci_set_busid(): that's not because of virtio-vga vs. virtio-gpu-pci. Instead, it's due to the virtio-mmio vs. virtio-pci transports that are possible for virtio devices. Theoretically at least, a virtio-gpu device could be exposed by QEMU as a memory mapped device in arm/arm64 guests. In that case the "platform bus ID" would simply be the base address of the virtio-mmio register block. In practice, virtio-gpu over virtio-mmio would be an extremely outlandish configuration (noone does / should do that, plain and simple). Which is why implementing actual "platform bus ID" logic for the virtio-mmio transport case is unnecessary. It's just that the kernel shouldn't crash even if someone tries virtio-gpu over virtio-mmio. So, the wrapper function (with the pdev nullity check) should be preserved, even if not entirely for the reason you suspected. Anyway, my laptop seems to have ceased emitting sounds resembling a gas turbine, which I'll take as the completion of the 4.8 kernel build. Will be back soon with test results... Thanks! Laszlo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel