On 09/02/2016 02:30 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Add DT bindings for new MXSFB driver using the DRM framework.
>> The old MXSFB fbdev driver bindings are preserved in mxsfb.txt .
Sorry for the late reply.
> They should be documented in the same place as they describe the same
> h/w. I've not looked how incompatible they are, but I'd expect that to
> be described here.
Done, makes sense.
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb-drm.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> DRM is a Linuxism.
>
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb-drm.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb-drm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb-drm.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e70d337
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb-drm.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +* Freescale MXS LCD Interface (LCDIF) with KMS/DRM support
>
> KMS/DRM is a Linuxism.
So what do you put in the documentation instead, "driver using of graph" ?
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx23-lcdif" for i.MX23.
>> + Should be "fsl,imx28-lcdif" for i.MX28 and i.MX6SX.
>
> MX6SX should have it's own compatible string. Knowing some of the
> development history, I would doubt they are exactly the same.
>
> Also, IIRC MX50 variants have LCDIF.
OK, done.
>> +- reg: Address and length of the register set for lcdif
>> +- interrupts: Should contain lcdif interrupts
>> +- clocks: A list of phandle + clock-specifier pairs, one for each
>> + entry in 'clock-names'.
>> +- clock-names: A list of clock names. For MXSFB it should contain:
>> + - "pix" for the MXSFB block clock
>> + - (optional) "axi", "disp_axi" for the bus interface clock on MX6SX
>
> Doesn't this mean required on MX6SX?
Yes, it does, fixed.
>> +
>> +Required sub-nodes:
>> + - port: The connection to an encoder chip.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> + lcdif1: lcdif@02220000 {
>
> Drop the leading 0.
OK
>> + compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif";
>> + reg = <0x02220000 0x4000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF1_PIX>,
>> + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_LCDIF_APB>,
>> + <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_DISPLAY_AXI>;
>> + clock-names = "pix", "axi", "disp_axi";
>> +
>> + port {
>> + parallel_out: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_parallel>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> --
>> 2.9.3
>>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
