On 19.09.2016 23:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:27 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> @@ -122,14 +126,14 @@ int udl_handle_damage(struct udl_framebuffer *fb, int x, int y, >> return 0; >> cmd = urb->transfer_buffer; >> >> - for (i = y; i < height ; i++) { >> + for (i = y; i <= y2 ; i++) { > > I think a simpler fix (which retains Noralf's nice cleanup would be to > change the loop condition to i < y + height. At least that seems to be > the underlying bug. Can you pls test that and then submit either that > one-liner (if it works) or your original patch (it's missing the > signed-off-by right now, so can't be merged as-is)? Either one has my > r-b (preemptive since I'm travelling). > > Thanks, Daniel > Feel free to (re)send patch v3, whenever you can. After all, the idea is yours. Respect _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel