On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:20:19AM +0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When merging sync_files there is a case when we can end up with only one
> fence in the merged sync_file: when all fences belong to the same
> timeline.
>
> So for this case a fence_array is not created instead we just assigned the
> fence to sync_file->fence. Then we do not use the fences array anymore nor
> does free it.
>
> This patch frees the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> index 706eea9..9ed4f9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int sync_file_set_fence(struct sync_file *sync_file,
> */
> if (num_fences == 1) {
> sync_file->fence = fences[0];
> + kfree(fences);
Ok, that makes sense wrt the code. I don't see any particular advantage
in a warning comment, so
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
