Re: [PATCH 5/6] GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt_data()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:07:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:19 +0200
> >
> > A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
> > the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end.
> > Thus return after the logging call in this case directly.
> 
> Did you test this?
> 

Don't be a dummy...  This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.

I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.  But asking
pointless rhetorical questions is not helpful.

A lot of people are CC'd and you're wasting everyone's time by asking
questions where you know the answer.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux