Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97814 On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Cheng Cao <bobcaocheng@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Cheng Cao <bobcaocheng@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 6 ++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 20 ++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > index 7a30af7..0b05dd9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > @@ -2907,6 +2907,12 @@ static unsigned int gen8_get_total_gtt_size(u16 bdw_gmch_ctl) > if (bdw_gmch_ctl > 4) > bdw_gmch_ctl = 4; > #endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > + /* Limit 64b platforms to a 4GB GGTT */ > + /* DMA 4GB protection */ > + if (bdw_gmch_ctl > 8) > + bdw_gmch_ctl = 8; > +#endif > > return bdw_gmch_ctl << 20; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > index 66be299a1..da272ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > @@ -352,47 +352,44 @@ static void gen8_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > unsigned long *base, unsigned long *size) > { > uint32_t reg_val = I915_READ(GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED); > + unsigned long stolen_top; > + struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt; > > *base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK; > > switch (reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK) { > case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_1M: > - *size = 1024 * 1024; > + *size = 1 << 10 << 10; > break; > case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_2M: > - *size = 2 * 1024 * 1024; > + *size = 2 << 10 << 10; > break; > case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_4M: > - *size = 4 * 1024 * 1024; > + *size = 4 << 10 << 10; > break; > case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_8M: > - *size = 8 * 1024 * 1024; > + *size = 8 << 10 << 10; > break; > default: > - *size = 8 * 1024 * 1024; > - MISSING_CASE(reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK); > - } > -} > - > -static void bdw_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > - unsigned long *base, unsigned long *size) > -{ > - struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt; > - uint32_t reg_val = I915_READ(GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED); > - unsigned long stolen_top; > + /* Whatever if it is a BDW device or SKL device > + * Or others devices.. > + * This way is always going to work on 5th > + * generation Intel Processer > + */ > + stolen_top = dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + ggtt->stolen_size; > > - stolen_top = dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + ggtt->stolen_size; > + *base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK; > > - *base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK; > + /* MLIMIT - MBASE => PEG */ > + /* -- mobile-5th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2.pdf */ > + if (*base == 0) { > + *size = 0; > + MISSING_CASE(reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK); > + } else > + *size = stolen_top - *base; > > - /* On these platforms, the register doesn't have a size field, so the > - * size is the distance between the base and the top of the stolen > - * memory. We also have the genuine case where base is zero and there's > - * nothing reserved. */ > - if (*base == 0) > - *size = 0; > - else > - *size = stolen_top - *base; > + break; > + } > } > > int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev) > @@ -442,14 +439,14 @@ int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev) > gen7_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base, > &reserved_size); > break; > + case 8: > + gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base, > + &reserved_size); > + break; > default: > - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || > - IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev)) > - bdw_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base, > - &reserved_size); > - else > - gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base, > - &reserved_size); > + // FIXME: This seemed like going to work > + gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base, > + &reserved_size); > break; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index bf2cad3..3dce37b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -1748,6 +1748,12 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells { > #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base) _MMIO((base)+0x1c8) /* gen8+ */ > #define RING_CTX_TIMESTAMP(base) _MMIO((base)+0x3a8) /* gen8+ */ > > +// 64 bit, low 32 preserved > +#define IOTLB_INVALID(base) _MMIO((base)+0x508 + 4) /* gen8+ */ > +#define IOTLB_INVALID_IVT (1<<31) > +#define IOTLB_GLOBAL_INV_REQ (1<<28) > +#define IOTLB_INVALID_IAIG (1<<25) > + > #define ERROR_GEN6 _MMIO(0x40a0) > #define GEN7_ERR_INT _MMIO(0x44040) > #define ERR_INT_POISON (1<<31) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 1d3161b..84dafcb 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -498,7 +498,25 @@ static void intel_ring_setup_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > * arises: do we still need this and if so how should we go about > * invalidating the TLB? > */ > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) { > + /* Respond to this question: > + * According to mobile-5th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2 from Intel > + * There are registers for invalidation, set those registers will > + * cause the hardware to perform IOTLB invalidation. > + */ > + if (IS_GEN8(dev_priv)) { > + i915_reg_t reg = IOTLB_INVALID(engine->mmio_base); > + > + /* ring should be idle before issuing a sync flush*/ > + WARN_ON((I915_READ_MODE(engine) & MODE_IDLE) == 0); > + > + I915_WRITE(reg, 0x0 | IOTLB_INVALID_IVT | IOTLB_GLOBAL_INV_REQ); > + > + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, > + reg, IOTLB_INVALID_IAIG, 0, > + 1000)) > + DRM_ERROR("%s: wait for TLB invalidation timed out\n", > + engine->name); > + } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) { > i915_reg_t reg = RING_INSTPM(engine->mmio_base); > > /* ring should be idle before issuing a sync flush*/ -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
