Hi Jon, On 23 August 2016 at 18:38, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:01:35 +0200 > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm also not too sure about whether dma-buf really should be it's own >> subdirectory. It's plucked from the device-drivers.tmpl, I think an >> overall device-drivers/ for all the misc subsystems and support code would >> be better. Then one toc there, which fans out to either kernel-doc and >> overview docs. > > I'm quite convinced it shouldn't be. > > If you get a chance, could you have a look at the "RFC: The beginning of > a proper driver-api book" series I posted yesterday (yes, I should have > copied more of you, sorry)? It shows the direction I would like to go > with driver API documentation, and, assuming we go that way, I'd like the > dma-buf documentation to fit into that. > Thanks for your comments, and direction. I'll rework the patches on top of yours then. I'll have a look at your patches to think about how do we handle API guides / detailed documentation as well. > Thanks, > > jon Best, Sumit. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
