Re: [RFC 0/2] New feature: Framebuffer processors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 22 August 2016 at 16:23, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess a lot comes down to 'how long before hw designers bolt a CP to
> the thing'..  at that point, I think you especially don't want a
> per-blit kernel interface.

Regardless of whether or not we want it, we already _have_ it, in the
form of V4L2 M2M. There are already a few IP blocks working on that, I
believe. If V4L2 <-> KMS interop is painful, well, we need to fix that
anyway ...

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux