On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> While I understand some people want to discuss this further, these >> patches must land first in order bring back the compatibility with >> libdrm. > This is where the misunderstanding lies - there _must_ _not_ be > compatible with the libdrm ones, but the other way around. Check the > output of $ git log -p -- include/drm in libdrm. Pretty please ? Yes, uapi needs to flow from the kernel. libdrm cannot be treated as the master copy for shared headers. I think the problem here was simply that a patch landed without the Ack from maintainers, or they didn't check things carefully enough. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
