I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_mixer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_mixer.c
index aed7801..6b1f7ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_mixer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_mixer.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
/* Module parameter to set the background color of the mixer */
static unsigned int bkg_color = 0x000000;
MODULE_PARM_DESC(bkgcolor, "Value of the background color 0xRRGGBB");
-module_param_named(bkgcolor, bkg_color, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(bkgcolor, bkg_color, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
/* Identity: G=Y , B=Cb , R=Cr */
static const u32 mixerColorSpaceMatIdentity[] = {
--
2.9.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
