On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Also, I'm not a particular fan of the k* naming, but I see 'fence' is > > already taken. > > Agreed, I really want to rename the dma-buf fence to struct dma_fence - > we would need to do that whilst it dma-buf fencing is still in its infancy. +1 on dma_fence, seems to make more sense than plain struct fence. Probably best to do after the recent pile of work from Gustavo to de-stage sync_file has landed. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
