On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:18:16PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated > by of_parse_display_timing() called from of_get_drm_display_mode(), > but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to > drm_display_mode.flags. > Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access > to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver. > > Changes vs. v2: > - removed patches which have already been applied > - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code > duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel > > Changes vs. v1: > - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as > per Philipp Zabel's request > > GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when > GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags > GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > include/drm/drm_modes.h | 5 +++-- > 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Maybe a stupid question, but why does i.MX even allow video timings to be specified in DT instead of going through panel drivers like everyone else? Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
