Sean, On 06/23/2016 09:27 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As vendor document indicate, when REF_CLK bit set 0, then DP phy's REF_CLK should switch to 24M source clock. But due to IC PHY layout mistaken, some chips need to flip this bit(like RK3288), and unfortunately they didn't indicate in the DP version register. That's why we have to make this little hack. Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v3: - Make this hack code more clear (Tomasz, reviewed at Google Gerrit) reg = ~reg & REF_CLK_MASK; ---> reg ^= REF_CLK_MASK; [https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/346852/7/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c@80] - Add tested flag from Javier Changes in v2: - new patch in v2 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 6 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 3 +++ include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c index 931a76c..97ced6b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c @@ -75,7 +75,11 @@ void analogix_dp_init_analog_param(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_ANALOG_CTL_2); if (dp->plat_data && (dp->plat_data->dev_type == ROCKCHIP_DP)) { - writel(REF_CLK_24M, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_1); + reg = REF_CLK_24M; + if (dp->plat_data->subdev_type == RK3288_DP) + reg ^= REF_CLK_MASK; + + writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_1); writel(0x95, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_2); writel(0x40, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_3); writel(0x58, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_4); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h index 88d56ad..cdcc6c5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ /* ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_1 */ #define REF_CLK_24M (0x1 << 0) #define REF_CLK_27M (0x0 << 0) +#define REF_CLK_MASK (0x1 << 0) /* ANALOGIX_DP_LANE_MAP */ #define LANE3_MAP_LOGIC_LANE_0 (0x0 << 6) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c index 3855f46..315ebba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_chip_data { u32 lcdsel_grf_reg; u32 lcdsel_big; u32 lcdsel_lit; + u32 chip_type; }; struct rockchip_dp_device { @@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, dp->plat_data.encoder = &dp->encoder; dp->plat_data.dev_type = ROCKCHIP_DP; + dp->plat_data.subdev_type = dp_data->chip_type; dp->plat_data.power_on = rockchip_dp_poweron; dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; @@ -384,6 +386,7 @@ static const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data rk3288_dp = { .lcdsel_grf_reg = 0x025c, .lcdsel_big = 0 | BIT(21), .lcdsel_lit = BIT(5) | BIT(21), + .chip_type = RK3288_DP, }; static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dp_dt_ids[] = { diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h index 9e5d013..06c0250 100644 --- a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h +++ b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h @@ -18,8 +18,13 @@ enum analogix_dp_devtype { ROCKCHIP_DP, }; +enum analogix_dp_sub_devtype { + RK3288_DP, +}; + struct analogix_dp_plat_data { enum analogix_dp_devtype dev_type; + enum analogix_dp_sub_devtype subdev_type;So this is what I was talking about in my review of the first patch of the series. I don't personally think the dev and subdev types add any clarity here, just more state. I'd prefer that you put the product number in the top level devtype, and add a helper function like: static bool is_rockchip(enum analogix_dp_devtype type) { return type == ... || type == ... }
Good idea, done. Thanks, - Yakir
Seanstruct drm_panel *panel; struct drm_encoder *encoder; struct drm_connector *connector; -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
