Please ignore this mail.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Bhaktipriya Shridhar
<bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The workqueue g2d_workq has only a single workitem(&g2d->runqueue_work)
> and hence doesn't require ordering. Also, it is not being used on a
> memory reclaim path. Hence, the singlethreaded workqueue has been
> replaced with the use of system_wq.
>
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and hence it's not required to have a singlethreaded
> workqueue just to gain concurrency. Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue
> created with create_singlethread_workqueue(), system_wq allows multiple
> work items to overlap executions even on the same CPU; however, a
> per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU locality or global ordering
> guarantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the
> increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference.
>
> Occurences of the label err_destroy_workqueue have also been removed
> because with the usage of system_wq, calls to destroy_workqueue() have
> been dropped, which makes the label unnecessary.
>
> Work item has been flushed in g2d_remove() to ensure that nothing is
> pending when the driver disconnects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 16 +++-------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> index 4935523..defb9d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ struct g2d_data {
> struct clk *gate_clk;
> void __iomem *regs;
> int irq;
> - struct workqueue_struct *g2d_workq;
> struct work_struct runqueue_work;
> struct exynos_drm_subdrv subdrv;
> bool suspended;
> @@ -921,7 +920,7 @@ static irqreturn_t g2d_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
>
> if (pending & G2D_INTP_ACMD_FIN)
> - queue_work(g2d->g2d_workq, &g2d->runqueue_work);
> + schedule_work(&g2d->runqueue_work);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> @@ -1380,13 +1379,6 @@ static int g2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> g2d->dev = dev;
>
> - g2d->g2d_workq = create_singlethread_workqueue("g2d");
> - if (!g2d->g2d_workq) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to create workqueue\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto err_destroy_slab;
> - }
> -
> INIT_WORK(&g2d->runqueue_work, g2d_runqueue_worker);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&g2d->free_cmdlist);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&g2d->runqueue);
> @@ -1398,7 +1390,7 @@ static int g2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(g2d->gate_clk)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get gate clock\n");
> ret = PTR_ERR(g2d->gate_clk);
> - goto err_destroy_workqueue;
> + goto err_destroy_slab;
> }
>
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> @@ -1449,8 +1441,6 @@ static int g2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> err_put_clk:
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> -err_destroy_workqueue:
> - destroy_workqueue(g2d->g2d_workq);
> err_destroy_slab:
> kmem_cache_destroy(g2d->runqueue_slab);
> return ret;
> @@ -1471,7 +1461,7 @@ static int g2d_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>
> g2d_fini_cmdlist(g2d);
> - destroy_workqueue(g2d->g2d_workq);
> + flush_work(&g2d->runqueue_work);
> kmem_cache_destroy(g2d->runqueue_slab);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
