On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Christian König
<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>
> We want to keep the newest fence, not the oldest one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> index 0c389a5..4da0e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ int ttm_bo_pipeline_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> */
>
> spin_lock(&from->move_lock);
> - if (!from->move || fence_is_later(from->move, fence)) {
> + if (!from->move || fence_is_later(fence, from->move)) {
> fence_put(from->move);
> from->move = fence_get(fence);
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
