On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:23:38AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 17/06/16 17:47, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:03:46PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> Populate the 'sor-safe' clock for DPAUX devices on Tegra210 that require > >> this clock for operation. Update the compatability string for the DPAUX > >> instance at address 0x545c0000 to be "nvidia,tegra210-dpaux" to ensure > >> that the 'sor-safe' clock is enabled for this device. > > > > Does the second DPAUX need this, too? I have a vague recollection that > > they were both slightly different. > > I have assumed so, but I am checking with the h/w folks on this. Right > now the TRM only describes the procedure for configuring the DPAUX pads > for i2c6. I am also asking about sharing the DPAUX1 pads with i2c4. Yes, last time I looked it wasn't documented anywhere with which I2C controller the other DPAUX shared its pads. It'd be good to get all of that documented in the TRM. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
