2016-06-10 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:05:29PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Creates a function that given an sync file descriptor returns a > > fence_collection containing all fences in the sync_file. > > > > If there is only one fence in the sync_file this fence itself is returned, > > however if there is more than one, a fence_collection fence is returned. > > > > v2: Comments by Daniel Vetter > > - Adapt to new version of fence_collection_init() > > - Hold a reference for the fence we return > > > > v3: - Adapt to use fput() directly > > - rename to sync_file_get_fence() as we always return one fence > > > > v4: Adapt to use fence_array > > The sync_file looks just like a fence_array plus struct file integration. > Is there a good reason why we cannot just use fence_array here? I think the only reason is because I haven't thought about this before. If we add proper support to fence_array we can make sync_files even simpler. Gustavo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
