On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:08:02AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We don't need to use &radeon_crtc->base there as crtc is available > in the function. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> All expect patch 5 merged, thanks. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > index 2fb18f1..fb461f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c > @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static int radeon_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > return 0; > > vblank_cleanup: > - drm_crtc_vblank_put(&radeon_crtc->base); > + drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc); > > pflip_cleanup: > if (unlikely(radeon_bo_reserve(new_rbo, false) != 0)) { > -- > 2.5.5 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel