Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] rockchip: rockchip: add new clock-type for the ddrclk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shawn,

On 2016年06月03日 20:29, Shawn Lin wrote:
Hi Lin,

It looks good with only a few minor comments.

On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote:
On new rockchip platform(rk3399 etc), there have dcf controller to
do ddr frequency scaling, and this controller will implement in
arm-trust-firmware. We add a special clock-type to handle that.

Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v1:
- None

 drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile  |   1 +
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c     |   9 +++
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h     |  27 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile b/drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile
index f47a2fa..b5f2c8e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-y    += clk-pll.o
 obj-y    += clk-cpu.o
 obj-y    += clk-inverter.o
 obj-y    += clk-mmc-phase.o
+obj-y    += clk-ddr.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER)    += softrst.o

 obj-y    += clk-rk3036.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5b6630d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Rockchip Electronics Co. Ltd.
+ * Author: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include "clk.h"
+

alphabetical order would be better.
    Okay, will fix next version, thank you.

+struct rockchip_ddrclk {
+    struct clk_hw    hw;
+    void __iomem    *reg_base;
+    int        mux_offset;
+    int        mux_shift;
+    int        mux_width;
+    int        mux_flag;
+    int        div_shift;
+    int        div_width;
+    int        div_flag;
+    spinlock_t    *lock;
+};
+
+#define to_rockchip_ddrclk_hw(hw) container_of(hw, struct rockchip_ddrclk, hw)
+#define val_mask(width)    ((1 << (width)) - 1)
+
+static int rockchip_ddrclk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
+                    unsigned long prate)
+{
+    struct rockchip_ddrclk *ddrclk = to_rockchip_ddrclk_hw(hw);
+    unsigned long flags;
+
+    spin_lock_irqsave(ddrclk->lock, flags);
+
+    /* TODO: set ddr rate in bl31 */
+
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(ddrclk->lock, flags);
+

What do you wanna protect here?
    I am not sure for now, when i finish this function,
    if there nothing need protect i will remove it. Thank you.

+    return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+rockchip_ddrclk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+                unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+    struct rockchip_ddrclk *ddrclk = to_rockchip_ddrclk_hw(hw);
+    int val;
+
+    val = clk_readl(ddrclk->reg_base +
+            ddrclk->mux_offset) >> ddrclk->div_shift;
+    val &= val_mask(ddrclk->div_width);
+
+    return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, val + 1);
+}
+
+static long clk_ddrclk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+                  unsigned long *prate)
+{
+    return rate;
+}
+
+static u8 rockchip_ddrclk_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+    struct rockchip_ddrclk *ddrclk = to_rockchip_ddrclk_hw(hw);
+    int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
+    u32 val;
+
+    val = clk_readl(ddrclk->reg_base +
+            ddrclk->mux_offset) >> ddrclk->mux_shift;
+    val &= val_mask(ddrclk->mux_width);
+
+    if (val >= num_parents)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    return val;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops rockchip_ddrclk_ops = {
+    .recalc_rate = rockchip_ddrclk_recalc_rate,
+    .set_rate = rockchip_ddrclk_set_rate,
+    .round_rate = clk_ddrclk_round_rate,
+    .get_parent = rockchip_ddrclk_get_parent,
+};
+
+struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(const char *name, int flags,
+                     const char *const *parent_names,
+                     u8 num_parents, int mux_offset,
+                     int mux_shift, int mux_width,
+                     int mux_flag, int div_shift,
+                     int div_width, int div_flag,
+                     void __iomem *reg_base,
+                     spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+    struct rockchip_ddrclk *ddrclk;
+    struct clk_init_data init;
+    struct clk *clk;
+    int ret;
+
+    ddrclk = kzalloc(sizeof(*ddrclk), GFP_KERNEL);
+    if (!ddrclk)
+        return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+    init.name = name;
+    init.parent_names = parent_names;
+    init.num_parents = num_parents;
+    init.ops = &rockchip_ddrclk_ops;
+
+    init.flags = flags;
+    init.flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT;
+    init.flags |= CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;

can we combine these two?

+
+    ddrclk->reg_base = reg_base;
+    ddrclk->lock = lock;
+    ddrclk->hw.init = &init;
+    ddrclk->mux_offset = mux_offset;
+    ddrclk->mux_shift = mux_shift;
+    ddrclk->mux_width = mux_width;
+    ddrclk->mux_flag = mux_flag;
+    ddrclk->div_shift = div_shift;
+    ddrclk->div_width = div_width;
+    ddrclk->div_flag = div_flag;
+
+    clk = clk_register(NULL, &ddrclk->hw);
+    if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+ pr_err("%s: could not register ddrclk %s\n", __func__, name);
+        ret = PTR_ERR(clk);

Why do you need PTR_ERR and then convert back again.
Yes, there is only one error for ret value, so i can return "NULL" directly, thank you.

+        goto free_ddrclk;
+    }
+
+    return clk;
+
+free_ddrclk:
+    kfree(ddrclk);
+    return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c
index 7ffd134..6ac1aa5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c
@@ -484,6 +484,15 @@ void __init rockchip_clk_register_branches(
                 list->gate_offset, list->gate_shift,
                 list->gate_flags, flags, &ctx->lock);
             break;
+        case branch_ddrc:
+            clk = rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(
+                list->name, list->flags,
+                list->parent_names, list->num_parents,
+                list->muxdiv_offset, list->mux_shift,
+                list->mux_width, list->mux_flags,
+                list->div_shift, list->div_width,
+                list->div_flags, ctx->reg_base, &ctx->lock);
+            break;
         }

         /* none of the cases above matched */
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
index 2194ffa..4033fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
@@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char *name,
                 const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
                 void __iomem *reg, int shift);

+struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(const char *name, int flags,
+            const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
+            int mux_offset, int mux_shift, int mux_width,
+            int mux_flag, int div_shift, int div_width,
+            int div_flag, void __iomem *reg_base,
+            spinlock_t *lock);
+
 #define ROCKCHIP_INVERTER_HIWORD_MASK    BIT(0)

 struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_inverter(const char *name,
@@ -299,6 +306,7 @@ enum rockchip_clk_branch_type {
     branch_mmc,
     branch_inverter,
     branch_factor,
+    branch_ddrc,
 };

 struct rockchip_clk_branch {
@@ -488,6 +496,25 @@ struct rockchip_clk_branch {
         .child        = ch,                \
     }

+#define COMPOSITE_DDRC(_id, cname, pnames, f, mo, ms, mw, mf,    \
+             ds, dw, df)                \

it seems a duplication exept for branch_type.
    We just need this different branch_type, so we can add case in
rockchip_clk_register_branches() and call rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk().

+    {                            \
+        .id        = _id,                \
+        .branch_type    = branch_ddrc,            \
+        .name        = cname,            \
+        .parent_names    = pnames,            \
+        .num_parents    = ARRAY_SIZE(pnames),        \
+        .flags        = f,                \
+        .muxdiv_offset    = mo,                \
+        .mux_shift    = ms,                \
+        .mux_width    = mw,                \
+        .mux_flags    = mf,                \
+        .div_shift    = ds,                \
+        .div_width    = dw,                \
+        .div_flags    = df,                \
+        .gate_offset    = -1,                \
+    }
+
 #define MUX(_id, cname, pnames, f, o, s, w, mf)            \
     {                            \
         .id        = _id,                \




--
Lin Huang


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux