On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To get KFD support in radeon we need the following
> initialization to happen in this order, their
> respective driver file that has its init routine
> listed next to it:
>
> 0. AMD IOMMUv1: arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> 1. AMD IOMMUv2: drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c
> 2. AMD KFD: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> 3. AMD Radeon: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
>
> Order is rather implicit, but these drivers can currently
> only do so much given the amount of leg room available.
> Below are the respective init routines and how they are
> initialized:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c rootfs_initcall(pci_iommu_init);
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c module_init(amd_iommu_v2_init);
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c module_init(kfd_module_init);
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c module_init(radeon_init);
>
> When a driver is built-in module_init() folds to use
> device_initcall(), and we have the following possible
> orders:
>
> #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 0)
> #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 1)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn)__define_initcall(fn, 2)
> #define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 3)
> #define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 4)
> #define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 5)
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> #define rootfs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, rootfs)
> #define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 6)
> #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
>
> Since we start off from rootfs_initcall(), it gives us 3 more
> levels of leg room to play with for order semantics, this isn't
> enough to address all required levels of dependencies, this
> is specially true given that AMD-KFD needs to be loaded before
> the radeon driver -- -but this it not enforced by symbols.
> If the AMD-KFD driver is not loaded prior to the radeon driver
> because otherwise the radeon driver will not initialize the
> AMD-KFD driver and you get no KFD functionality in userspace.
>
> Commit 1bacc894c227fad8a7 ("drivers: Move iommu/ before gpu/ in
> Makefile") works around some of the possibe races between
> the AMD IOMMU v2 and GPU drivers by changing the link order.
> This is fragile, however its the bets we can do, given that
> making the GPU drivers use late_initcall() would also implicate
> a similar race between them. That possible race is fortunatley
> addressed given that the drm Makefile currently has amdkfd
> linked prior to radeon:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> ...
> obj-$(CONFIG_HSA_AMD) += amd/amdkfd/
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RADEON)+= radeon/
> ...
>
> Changing amdkfd and radeon to late_initcall() however is
> still the right call in orde to annotate explicitly a
> delayed dependency requirement between the GPU drivers
> and the IOMMUs.
>
> We can't address the fragile nature of the link order
> right now, but in the future that might be possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Please note, the changes to drivers/Makefile are just
> for the sake of forcing the possible race to occur,
> if this works well the actual [PATCH] submission will
> skip those changes as its pointless to remove those
> work arounds as it stands, due to the limited nature
> of the levels available for addressing requirements.
>
> Also, if you are aware of further dependency hell
> things like these -- please do let me know as I am
> interested in looking at addressing them.
This should be fixed with -EDEFER_PROBE instead. Frobbing initcall
levels should then just be done as an optimization to avoid too much
reprobing.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
