On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:32:46 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700 > > Ian Romanick <idr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Is there any way we could do this and NOT break building older versions > > > of Mesa? I'd like to be able to build 7.9, 7.10, and master on my > > > system without having two different versions of glproto. > > > > > > > We did that the last time glproto bumped (kept the req at 1.4.10 and > > added ifdefs), but that added bugs that we didn't find for awhile, so I > > wanted to try to avoid it this time. Another option for you would be > > to build 7.9, 7.10, and master against different install roots with > > PKG_CONFIG_PATH set appropriately... > > > > How about you try again, with an increased emphasis on not adding bugs, > now that you know what you did wrong the first time? How about you look at git and see what happened last time? We added some dri2 proto requests, and people wanted to build with old versions w/o the new requests. So they added some ifdefs but didn't check all the combos (now not just old server/new server, but multiplied by two) and things were broken for awhile, and it was easy to get breakage without even noticing (I found several bugs for people related to invalidation that were solely due to bad builds). -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
