Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: >> >>> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return >>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier >>> update pending. >>> >>> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is: >>> >>> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is >>> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue >>> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that. >>> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a >>> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the >>> * commit in that case. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any >> other KMS folks to catch anything. >> > > I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch. > Does anyone have objections to it being merged? I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
